Monday, April 11, 2022

THERE’S A REASON AMERICANS TELL ATTORNEY JOKES

 




Why do attorneys lose lawsuits?

Some wonder if the joke is on we the people, the ordinary citizen, trying to live life, to care for themselves and their families as intended by the Creator.

At the Executive Club meeting in Portland on April 7, 2022, Desmond Bellard,  Constitutional Party Oregonian, running for governor, stated to the evening’s speaker running for state representative office, Kevin Mannix, an attorney in the Elkhorn Baptist Church et al vs Governor Katherine Brown et al and a re-districting lawsuit with both cases a failure; Bellard told Mannix his theory of the re-districting case, “You intentionally lost the case.” The allegation resulted in Mannix reacting with anger and hostility towards Bellard.

Truth in the Pacific Northwest (TPNW) then gave Mannix information of having seen no lawsuit in two years that took on how Governor Kate Brown violated the emergency law from day one, by not dialing down into ORS 401.165(1)(2)(5). Mannix nodded in acknowledgement of that law.

Mannix was informed businesses stayed open and kept OSHA at bay by simply using the US and Oregon Constitutions, and by not by falling into the regulatory trap of acting as though OSHA had legal authority. The strategy cost businesses no money, and businesses did not have to hire an attorney. The template letter businesses used was as follows:

"Dear OSHA:

Thank you for your correspondence dated _____in which you requested my response within 5 business days regarding complaint #_________ on my business.

To respond comprehensively, cogently, and cooperatively I request documents to review, consider, evaluate, and analyze regarding Complaint #_________.

Links on computers can be unreliable can have changed or no longer be there from the day you advised me of an allegation. Government websites historically have problems.

Send hard copies by US Postal mail to deliver the materials needed for me to respond. Please send hard copies of the following & specifically highlight subsections of these laws you deem applicable to complaint allegation #_____ & highlight them in yellow:
1. The United States Constitution
2. The Oregon Constitution
3. Federal Civil Rights laws
4. Oregon State Laws

Hard copies are necessary if by chance the state of Oregon issues to me some other legal document then you and I both have hard copies of the same document where both documents, the original to me; and the copy that stays with you, we then, we both have the same highlighted sections/subsections of law, showing your decision as a government worker the legal decision, you made regarding this complaint allegation.

Consult with your OSHA attorney before sending the materials. Please disclose attorney names with their contact information.

Release to me copies of emails/texts that speak to my name, person, or business as I feel confident you or others in your office/division/department consulted/spoke prior to you sending me your correspondence action dated __________2021. Please make my records request date range from ____________2021 to __________2021.

Thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to receiving and reviewing your materials.

Sincerely, "
After receiving such a letter OSHA would go silent and have no more contact with the business.

When criticized for his reaction to the previous citizen’s turn at the microphone, Mannix responded again with anger. The response in turn was, “Kevin don’t make me start telling attorney jokes.”


60 Best Lawyer Puns And Jokes For You To Judge (kidadl.com)

Outside the meeting room, Mannix was conciliatory and stated attorneys who tried to help their clients, that those were businesses who had already received fines and sanctions.

Curious about the allegation made against Mannix, research and review of material on-line showed Mannix, an attorney. along with Ray Hacke on the Elkhorn Baptist Church et al vs Katherine Brown, Governor of the State of Oregon et al 2020 lawsuit charging the governor with violating an emergency law. TPNW authored an article about that in October 2021:

https://truthinthepacificnorthwest.blogspot.com/2021/10/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

Further review showed after the Oregon Supreme Court’s 525 page “decision” the plaintiffs withdrew their lawsuit and a new one was not filed even as the Supreme Court left that option open for a short period of time.

In the 525 pages of the Oregon Supreme Court legal document starting with a per curiam that read very chatty about the “pandemic” with the words “…as we all know…”. Hardly evidentiary. Lucky for the court’s justices none had to admit to being Chatty Cathy as per curiam opinions are anonymous. Anonymous sources like mainstream media uses.

In spite of all the chattiness the court failed to address Emergency Law ORS 401.165(2). 


Kate Brown’s March 8, 2020 executive order declaring an emergency noted “two counties” requested an emergency declaration for COVID-19 based only on “…14 presumptive…” cases of COVID-19. TPNW had a records request in for which two counties since February 27, 2022. After waiting over a month for a readily available record tied to Brown’s declaration of an emergency if one existed the governor’s office finally responded.


“No Applicable Records Available” Another reason then how Kate Brown violated the emergency law. 

On July 1, 2021 instead of Mannix seeing the errors within what might be called Find Waldo in the 525 page opinion piece that feels like a gaslighting document in trying to read it, Mannix and Hacke pulled the lawsuit.

Plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss lawsuit challenging governor's pandemic restrictions | Coronavirus | eastoregonian.com

 

How did Mannix and Hacke miss this:

 


The court told Mannix what he missed yet he had the plaintiffs drop the lawsuit? 



Ray Hacke’s reason not to pursue the case:


No records or articles were found that Mannix “intentionally” lost the Elkhorn case, but it is of compelling concern to Oregonians that these two attorneys disclosed, in the end, they are not up to taking on challenging and difficult cases in court, cases that reflect the very freedoms given to Americans by the Creator. And in this instance 4.2 million Oregonians.

Mannix history, expertise, and experience touted on his website shows an attorney for all intent and purposes should have easily defeated Kate Brown in court.


The Elkhorn case plaintiffs were a few Oregonians out of millions of Oregonians traumatized by the shutdown of Oregon that Kate Brown inflicted on Oregonians including children with her themed administrative state work of “Revenge is a dish best served cold and slowly.”

It’s hard for many Oregonians to understand how this case was too challenging and difficult for someone with Mannix’s resume? As he now uses that resume to ask Oregonians to vote for him to be their state representative?

It’s unknown at this time if Mannix's re-districting loss has a similar story line of too challenging and difficult as opposed to “intentional.”

April 11, 2022

 

                                                    Advertisement

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment