Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Voters hoodwinked again. Voter pamphlet in Multnomah County does NOT go to its 576,399 registered voters. Only by bulk mail to 350,000 residential addresses. NONE of the Voters' pamphlets are addressed to registered voters.

Voters have a right to vote, but voters don't have a right to know what they are voting on. In 2022 Multnomah County elections did not respond as to how many voters did not get election information that year. The answer? Over 226,000. The 350,000 pamphlets mailed out, it is hit or miss if they get to any registered voter. These are simply "bulk mail" to addresses in general. 

With all the shenanigans that have gone on with the Portland media companies and newspapers, some Oregonians think it’s laughable that the Voter Pamphlet says “You have the right to Vote”, but the reality is voters don’t have a right to hear from all candidates…which then only leaves the ones PDX media wants to either showcase or shadow ban. 

No wonder that Multnomah County Elections ignored this question in May 2022. Pamphlets are not sent to "registered" voters. 

 

https://truthinthepacificnorthwest.blogspot.com/2022/05/occams-razor-day-multnomah-county.html 

To add to this game there are likely 154,000 inactive voters. Oregon government, the Secretary of State, flies the banner of wanting all registered voters to vote. Then why do they retain an inactive file? What is the real use of this inactive voter list?

TPNW editor, who is running for state representative office in District #44 in north Portland had to make a separate request in February 2026 to get a walking list of about 1800 in precinct 4406 of the seven precincts in District #44. Why wouldn't elections want those1800 in that precinct to not get canvassing materials and not to get out the vote (GOTV) visits to encourage them to vote?

Thus far the visits to those on the inactive list showed they don't live there. Why keep a list of them at all? Election cybersecurity expert, Mark Cook, in 2022 testifying as an expert in the Washington County vs Tim Sippel trial testified that machines used, they all have a "backdoor" to easily access and simply change vote totals.
 
 Mark is now getting some national exposure when 10 seconds of Mark's testimony to Georgia got edited out of Mark's testimony of how easily vote changing in these machines can happen.
 Here's the short version of the major scandal in Georgia:
 
 
"Ridiculous waste of money to count dots." -Mark Cook
 
From 2018 when the TPNW editor began doing elections observations, Multnomah County Elections refused to identify who their IT guy(s) were. It turned out it was Dan Forester who walked us observers through testing the voting machine for "accuracy" which now some observers see as also being "theater" along with adjudication and signature verification processes.
 When it turned out in 2022 it was Dan Forester who was the IT guy, who had left to head up Washington County's elections, the editor was referred by Elections Director, Tim Scott to go Dan to answer the question about the adjudication process, the editor encountered Dan at the Tim Sippel trial, but when asked about adjudication, Dan simply walked away, refusing to answer.
 
 
How deep and how corrupt might all these shenanigans have grown since vote by mail was plugged into the election system in 1987?  An easy one day election turned into weeks and weeks on end to now "count". Adjudication and signature verification all theater with observers the "extra" cast members to make it all look valid? That's this observer's opinion from observing since 2018.
 
When a voter gets their ballot does it include a flyer with an on-line link to the Voters pamphlet? Or is that buried as well. The Secretary of State wants all registered voters to vote? But not have information as to what they are voting on?
 
Voters have a right to vote, but voters don't have a right to know what they are voting on.
 
March 25, 2026

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home