Portland DHM polling, headed by “proud Minnesotan” John Horvick, friends with the Oregonian and Willamette Week. Governor Kate Brown is from Minnesota. Like kids in an arcade, in a gaming room, bad actor pollsters get a kick out of coming up with the strategies, the sleight of hand maneuvers, the gotcha moves, the card tricks, hall of mirrors, they tricked some Republicans into believing 32% in a poll means pro-life Christine Drazan, after Roe v Wade was overturned, can win the governor’s race.
The number of Oregonians fed up with the DINOs and RINOs, in name only Democrats and Republicans has grown the non-affiliated voter population to over 1 million, highest number, with Democrats coming in 2nd at a million and Republicans trailing at 730,000.
Are the non-affiliated voters given any respect? Only with candidate Betsy Johnson have they been given respect. The two major parties just expect a NAV leaning left and then a NAV leaning right will just vote for their former parties, for candidates they were not allowed to have a vote on in the primary election. Both parties mock and taunt the NAV citizen as being nothing.
The polling companies help out Elephants and Donkeys by creating and crafting the illusion in their polling calls that Betsy is a “minor 3rd party candidate” and don’t inform folks answering their phones that Betsy does NOT represent a political party. Planting in their mind that “minor 3rd party candidates” don’t win.
Polling “Queen of Heart” dealers don’t tell callers Oregon has a history of electing a non-affiliated candidate to the governor’s office.
Clout
Research out of Ohio created a manipulation strategy to craft Betsy Johnson as
a 3rd party candidate when non-affiliated voters have no political
party. Neither the mention non-affiliated voters in Oregon are over 1
million. Democrats at 1 million and Republican Party 3rd at
730,000. Here's one of the set up questions to cast Betsy as a "3rd political party" candidate which she is not.
According
to the Clout poll about 25% of Oregon voters combined would change their vote and/or still
were unsure. That's not highlighted in the article.
But the Clout headline news story doesn’t tell the reader any details of how they crafted their polling script or links any audios for the reader to hear how manipulative their calls were, instead this was their October 12, 2022 HEADLINE:
Bad actors know and count on readers only reading headlines AND believing them.
Who made up
the Clout Research company headline that Betsy Johnson was crashing?
Republicans. Mitt Romney and George H.W. Bush type Republicans. Bush was a
former CIA director. Virginia Governor Youngkins was in town to support Drazan.
He’s a Romney guy as well.
Looking at PDX
DHM’s recent “article” about their “polling,” some might ask John Horvick why
he didn’t link the poll? Horvick reports:
https://www.dhmresearch.com/oregonians-head-into-pivotal-election-year-in-sour-mood/
Look at what John “Queen of Hearts” Horvick who is buddies with the Oregonian and Willamette Week wrote without telling, showing or linking his card (polling script):
“Betsy Johnson is running for governor as a non-affiliated candidate. The survey asked about her four times. She has a lead when voters are presented with Johnson’s own campaign messaging about “leading from the center” and putting “Oregon ahead of narrow partisan politics.”
Betsy Johnson has "...a lead...". Did Horvick mean the lead over Tina Kotek and Christine Drazan? Horvick was poll predicting Betsy Johnson would win? Was it too painful for Horvick to report that? Why didn't Horvick give the % "...lead..." answer for that poll question?
But Horvick continued about Betsy Johnson: "However, she falls back into third place when voters learn about her voting record in the legislature and who is funding her campaign.”
INQUIRING
MINDS want to know
just what Horvick told the people he called about Betsy’s voting record and who
is funding her campaign? Just what did those callers “learn” from
Horvick? Did Horvick or the people calling for Horvick lie to and manipulate callers? Oregonians want to hear the audio on that question.
The headline of Horvick’s “news” “polling” article perhaps suggests Horvick’s mood rather than other peoples' mood? The mood of Willamette Week, maybe?
Some people with bona fides research backgrounds like Richard Baris, with Big Data Poll, discovered machinations between media, polling companies and the Uni-Party DINOs and RINOs; found a kind of trio trickery which many find unctuous and egregious, icky and gross.
Lt. Columbo inquiring minds about Horvick and his PDX DHM polling might go:
Is Horvick’s “Sour Mood” headline more about Horvick's mood because he found Betsy Johnson had gained ground, maybe the lead, so his polling switched to manipulating callers with his “take” on her voting record and donors?
For those who have done research projects, researchers would call this line from Horvick’s article a “Tell” (as in Texas Hold ‘Em):
Horvick, “However, she falls back into third place when voters learn about her voting record in the legislature and who is funding her campaign.” That’s more rightly called propaganda and not polling.
Allan Lichtman, a historian at American University called the 2016 presidential election accurately.
“Lichtman says elections are basically a judgment on how well the government has governed. The rest of the election season hoopla he dismisses as practically meaningless.
"All the twists and turns of the campaign, the ads, the speeches the campaign tricks, the debates count for little or nothing on Election Day," he says.
Lichtman believes the reason pollsters and pundits got it so wrong is simple. First, polls are not predictors. "They are just snapshots at a given point in time." And, he adds, an election is not a race to the finish line."The media makes money by covering the election as an exciting horse race, who's had a good day and a bad day. The pollsters make money by keeping score in the horse race — who's ahead and who's behind. All of that is misleading or worse.”
What do John Horvick, The Oregonian and Willamette Week say to that?
Another question must be asked about the DINOs and the RINOs since the pollsters in 2016 on the right and the left BOTH predicted Hillary Clinton would win with 90% of the vote. Have those two subsections been sub-plotting against the American people? Are the DINOs and RINOs in their own Uni-party?
Did outlier Donald J. Trump throw a hand grenade into that Uni-party? Were there shenanigans in those battleground states in 2020?
Truth in the Pacific Northwest has photo documentation that no COVID emergency went on in 2020 in the Portland/Vancouver Metro area at emergency rooms, urgent care clinics, MASH tents and COVID test sites. TPNW showed Kate Brown’s March 8, 2020 Executive Order violated the ORS emergency law.
Will 2020 end up being called the Year of the COVID COUP that ousted President Donald J. Trump?
The media collusion with Governor Kate Brown? Many Oregonians will never forgive Brown and the PDX media for the lockdowns, the masking, the pressure, the threats to get injections not approved by the FDA, and most of all for those who lost loved ones to the Stephen King/Mengele years of 2020-2021.
PDX DHM John Horvick’s sour mood, is it a “Tell’ he is worried Betsy Johnson might be the next governor of Oregon?
After the Oregonian endorsed Tina Kotek, the editorial board came clean and clarified Betsy Johnson is “not a spoiler”:
Betsy Johnson is not a spoiler candidate. Her credible run for office as a candidate independent of any party marks a significant breakthrough in a state where the two major political parties sideline alternative voices and block more than 1 million nonpartisan voters from their primaries.
https://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/2022/10/editorial-betsy-johnson-is-not-a-spoiler.html
The Editorial went on to further call out both the Democrat and Republican parties.
“Nope. A vote for Betsy Johnson is exactly that – a vote for Betsy Johnson, and Oregonians should feel free to vote for who they want, no guilt necessary.
Democrats and Republicans should instead reassess whether it’s prudent to continue locking out 41% of Oregon voters from their publicly funded primaries.
Oregonians should question why they are paying for these private clubs to keep them out and support efforts to bring open primaries to Oregon.
But insisting on party loyalty among people who have no party is a poor strategy – now and in the future.
Refusing to understand the dynamics that landed a non-affiliated candidate with this much power only ensures that this won’t be the last time.”
November 2, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment